Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Commons
Disclaimers
Commons
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
NYCMinutes04/12/2012
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Attendance === Dan Yifu Bryan Sarah [[User:Boxysean]] Amelia === Minutes === Bryan: [1] What is the vision of the FNF? Is it prescriptive of the network? [2] No, it's not." (in response to [1]) Amelia: [3] Yes it is. Vision to create infrastructure across America. (in response to [1]) Yifu: [4] Equipment is available today that wasn't 10 years ago, we have the ability to change. [5] Can make your network for how it works for your community instead of relying on the phone company. [6] NanoStation is important, example of recently available technology that enables consumer-driven networks. Dan: [7] Is this a form of libertarianism? (in response to [5]) Bryan: [8] This should not be a profit-driven thing. (in response to [7]) Dan: [9] The telecom market is not competitive, and should be more competitive. Bryan: [10] Wireless spectrum is a huge barrier-to-entry. Billions of dollars were spent recently to secure new spectrum rights. Yifu: [11] We are moving to a policy set that makes the FNF's goals more desirable (e.g., SOPA, PIPA) [12] Facebook game developers must use Facebook currency which has a 30% processing fee. Why don't we use something else? Why isn't there alternatives? Saraswathi: [13] With regards to Isaac's and Occupy.net's presentation two weeks ago at ITP: class was disillusioned by Isaac's "integrity" argument. It sounded good, but "you should use/support the FNF because you have integrity" is not a motivating factor. The economics of the idea, however, was appeal, especially the apartment building local net. Ying: [14] Economics of the FNF idea make sense, may even be cheaper. (in response to [13]) Bryan: [15] No evidence of cheaper, things are expensive and usually end up being more expensive than we predict. (in response to [14]) Sean: [16] Isaac lost the class when he left the economist argument and turned to an ideological argument. (in response to [13]) -- break -- Bryan: [17] Where are the layers that are least free? What are third parties that are working on these layers? Yifu: [18] I do this because I want to control my data. Bryan: [19] Notion of deletion does not exist on Facebook photos because it is a hard problem. Notion of data deletion does not exist in general. [20] Communicating the ideas is an integral part of the project. Storytelling, narratives, communicating why this is better. Yifu: [21] How can we make the tech work? The tech will communicate the power of the network. (in response to [20])
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Commons may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Commons:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)