Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Commons
Disclaimers
Commons
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Talk:Liberty Square Blueprint
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
Friends, I have just finished a minor edit of the blueprint. I thought the site tracks the changes, but if not the only change I made beyond spelling corrections was the line: Our goals are aimed at dissolving the effective "shadow government" created by the corporations and banks, that literally surrounds Liberty Plaza and is destroying the American dream, and our planet Earth. I know the term "shadow government" is controversial and there are some who favor its removal. I strongly advise we put this to the GA. I also think a question about the belief in the concept and the appropriateness of the term should be included in the survey I am planning. In the limited and flawed survey I already did 88% of the respondents said one of their goals in being at OWS was to decrease the infulence of money on the US political system. I think we may find that with creative wording we may find that the shadow government idea resonates with many. If OWS is America's Arab spring, the shadow government is the target. The corporate media has been clamoring for our goals. Think about how unhappy they will be if we force them to start talk seriously about the idea of a shadow government. Jim ==Re:Shadow govt== "Shadow government" is good in the way it implies that our government is actually just a diffuse projection emanating from the bright, bright lights of corporate capitalism. I just think that it could be more specific spelling this out. At the same time, I think we stand to gain from keeping metaphors succinct and unambiguous. "Shadow government" might be reaching a little too high. I also wanted to point out that occupy boston is working on a road map of their own: [http://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/Road_Map] Some people in the talk page were asking question about consistency with the language of OWS. I think this just highlights how we should be presenting this blueprint in some form sooner than later. As Goethe's motto goes, "ohne Rast aber ohne Hast" Without rest but without haste. Will be contributing my edits to both of these soon. Back in New York next week. Do we have a regular meeting time? Ted, any word from the GA? [[User:Forezt|forest]] 11:24, 30 October 2011 (CDT)
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Commons may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Commons:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)